# Profiling MXNet Models¶

It is often helpful to check the execution time of each operation in a neural network. You can then determine where to focus your effort to speed up model training or inference. In this tutorial, we will learn how to profile MXNet models to measure their running time and memory consumption using the MXNet profiler.

## The incorrect way to profile¶

If you have just started to use MXNet, you might be tempted to measure the execution time of your model using Python’s time module like shown below:

from time import time
from mxnet import autograd, nd
import mxnet as mx

start = time()
x = nd.random_uniform(shape=(2000,2000))
y = nd.dot(x, x)
print('Time for matrix multiplication: %f sec\n' % (time() - start))

start = time()
y_np = y.asnumpy()
print('Time for converting to numpy: %f sec' % (time() - start))


Time for matrix multiplication: 0.005051 sec

Time for converting to numpy: 0.167693 sec

From the timings above, it seems as if converting to numpy takes lot more time than multiplying two large matrices. That doesn’t seem right.

This is because, in MXNet, all operations are executed asynchronously. So, when nd.dot(x, x) returns, the matrix multiplication is not complete, it has only been queued for execution. However, asnumpy has to wait for the result to be calculated in order to convert it to numpy array on CPU, hence taking a longer time. Other examples of ‘blocking’ operations include asscalar and wait_to_read.

While it is possible to use NDArray.waitall() before and after operations to get running time of operations, it is not a scalable method to measure running time of multiple sets of operations, especially in a Sequential or hybridized network.

## The correct way to profile¶

The correct way to measure running time of MXNet models is to use MXNet profiler. In the rest of this tutorial, we will learn how to use the MXNet profiler to measure the running time and memory consumption of MXNet models. You can import the profiler and configure it from Python code.

from mxnet import profiler

profiler.set_config(profile_all=True,
aggregate_stats=True,
continuous_dump=True,
filename='profile_output.json')


profile_all enables all types of profiling. You can also individually enable the following types of profiling:

• profile_symbolic (boolean): whether to profile symbolic operators

• profile_imperative (boolean): whether to profile imperative operators

• profile_memory (boolean): whether to profile memory usage

• profile_api (boolean): whether to profile the C API

aggregate_stats aggregates statistics in memory which can then be printed to console by calling profiler.dumps().

### Setup: Build a model¶

Let’s build a small convolutional neural network that we can use to demonstrate profiling.

from mxnet import gluon

net = gluon.nn.HybridSequential()
with net.name_scope():


We need data that we can run through the network for profiling. We’ll use the MNIST dataset.

from mxnet.gluon.data.vision import transforms

dataset = gluon.data.vision.MNIST(train=True)
dataset = dataset.transform_first(transforms.ToTensor())


Let’s define a function that will run a single training iteration given data and label.

# Use GPU if available
if mx.context.num_gpus():
ctx=mx.gpu()
else:
ctx=mx.cpu()

# Initialize the parameters with random weights
net.collect_params().initialize(mx.init.Xavier(), ctx=ctx)

# Use SGD optimizer
trainer = gluon.Trainer(net.collect_params(), 'sgd', {'learning_rate': 0.1})

# Softmax Cross Entropy is a frequently used loss function for multi-class classification
softmax_cross_entropy = gluon.loss.SoftmaxCrossEntropyLoss()

# A helper function to run one training iteration
def run_training_iteration(data, label):
# Load data and label is the right context
data = data.as_in_context(ctx)
label = label.as_in_context(ctx)
# Run the forward pass
output = net(data)
loss = softmax_cross_entropy(output, label)
# Run the backward pass
loss.backward()
# Apply changes to parameters
trainer.step(data.shape[0])


### Starting and stopping the profiler from Python¶

When the first forward pass is run on a network, MXNet does a number of housekeeping tasks including inferring the shapes of various parameters, allocating memory for intermediate and final outputs, etc. For these reasons, profiling the first iteration doesn’t provide representative results for the rest of training. We will, therefore, skip the first iteration.

# Run the first iteration without profiling
run_training_iteration(*next(itr))


We’ll run the next iteration with the profiler turned on.

data, label = next(itr)

# Ask the profiler to start recording
profiler.set_state('run')

run_training_iteration(*next(itr))

# Make sure all operations have completed
mx.nd.waitall()
# Ask the profiler to stop recording
profiler.set_state('stop')
# Dump all results to log file before download
profiler.dump()


Between running and stopping the profiler, you can also pause and resume the profiler using profiler.pause() and profiler.resume() respectively to profile only parts of the code you want to profile.

### Starting the profiler automatically using an environment variable¶

The method described above requires code changes to start and stop the profiler. You can also start the profiler automatically and profile the entire code without any code changes using the MXNET_PROFILER_AUTOSTART environment variable.

$MXNET_PROFILER_AUTOSTART=1 python my_script.py MXNet will start the profiler automatically if you run your code with the environment variable MXNET_PROFILER_AUTOSTART set to 1. The profiler output is stored in profile.json inside the current directory. Note that the profiler output could be large depending on your code. It might be helpful to profile only sections of your code using the set_state API described in the previous section. ### Increasing granularity of the profiler output¶ MXNet executes computation graphs in ‘bulk mode’ which reduces kernel launch gaps in between symbolic operators for faster execution. This could reduce the granularity of the profiler output. If you need profiling result of every operator, please set the environment variables MXNET_EXEC_BULK_EXEC_INFERENCE and MXNET_EXEC_BULK_EXEC_TRAIN to 0 to disable the bulk execution mode. When working with networks created using the Gluon API, you will get a more granular profiling outputs if you profile networks that haven’t been hybridized. Operations can appear fused together in the profiling outputs after hybridization, which can make debugging tricky. ### Viewing profiler output¶ There are a few ways to view the information collected by the profiler. You can view it in the console, you can view a more graphical version in a browser, or you can use a vendor tool such as Intel VTune or Nvidia NVProf to view output. For most scenarios the information you need can be obtained with MXNet’s built in profiler support, but if you want to investigate the performance of operators alongside extra context about your hardware (e.g. cache hit rates, or CUDA kernel timings) then profiling jointly with vendor tools is recommended. #### 1. View in console¶ You can use the profiler.dumps() method to view the information collected by the profiler in the console. The collected information contains time taken by each operator, time taken by each C API and memory consumed in both CPU and GPU. profiler.set_state('run') profiler.set_state('stop') print(profiler.dumps())  #### 2. View in browser¶ You can also dump the information collected by the profiler into a json file using the profiler.dump() function and view it in a browser. profiler.dump(finished=False)  dump() creates a json file which can be viewed using a trace consumer like chrome://tracing in the Chrome browser. Here is a snapshot that shows the output of the profiling we did above. Note that setting the finished parameter to False will prevent the profiler from finishing dumping to file. If you just use profiler.dump(), you will no longer be able to profile the remaining sections of your model. Let’s zoom in to check the time taken by operators The above picture visualizes the sequence in which the operators were executed and the time taken by each operator. ### Profiling MKLDNN Operators¶ Reagrding MKLDNN operators, the library has already provided the internal profiling tool. Firstly, you need set MKLDNN_VERBOSE=1 to enable internal profiler. $ MKLDNN_VERBOSE=1 python my_script.py > mkldnn_verbose.log

Now, the detailed profiling insights of each mkldnn prmitive are saved into mkldnn_verbose.log (like below).

dnnl_verbose,info,DNNL v1.1.2 (commit cb2cc7ac17ff4e2ef50805c7048d33256d82be4d)
dnnl_verbose,info,Detected ISA is Intel AVX-512 with Intel DL Boost
dnnl_verbose,exec,cpu,convolution,jit:avx512_common,forward_inference,src_f32::blocked:aBcd16b:f0 wei_f32::blocked:ABcd16b16a:f0 bia_undef::undef::f0 dst_f32::blocked:aBcd16b:f0,,alg:convolution_direct,mb32_ic32oc32_ih256oh256kh3sh1dh0ph1_iw256ow256kw3sw1dw0pw1,20.7539


For example, if you want to calculate the total executing time of convolution primitive, you can just run:

$cat mkldnn_verbose.log | grep "exec,cpu,convolution" | awk 'BEGIN{FS=","} {SUM+=$11} END {print SUM}'

Moreover, you can set MKLDNN_VERBOSE=2 to collect both creating and executing time of each primitive.

$cat mkldnn_verbose.log | grep "create,cpu,convolution" | awk 'BEGIN{FS=","} {SUM+=$11} END {print SUM}'

$cat mkldnn_verbose.log | grep "exec,cpu,convolution" | awk 'BEGIN{FS=","} {SUM+=$11} END {print SUM}'

### Profiling Custom Operators¶

Should the existing NDArray operators fail to meet all your model’s needs, MXNet supports Custom Operators that you can define in Python. In forward() and backward() of a custom operator, there are two kinds of code: “pure Python” code (NumPy operators included) and “sub-operators” (NDArray operators called within forward() and backward()). With that said, MXNet can profile the execution time of both kinds without additional setup. Specifically, the MXNet profiler will break a single custom operator call into a pure Python event and several sub-operator events if there are any. Furthermore, all of those events will have a prefix in their names, which is, conveniently, the name of the custom operator you called.

Let’s try profiling custom operators with the following code example:

class MyAddOne(mx.operator.CustomOp):
def forward(self, is_train, req, in_data, out_data, aux):
self.assign(out_data[0], req[0], in_data[0]+1)

def backward(self, req, out_grad, in_data, out_data, in_grad, aux):

def __init__(self):

def list_arguments(self):
return ['data']

def list_outputs(self):
return ['output']

def infer_shape(self, in_shape):
return [in_shape[0]], [in_shape[0]], []

def create_operator(self, ctx, shapes, dtypes):

inp = mx.nd.zeros(shape=(500, 500))

profiler.set_config(profile_all=True, continuous_dump=True, \
aggregate_stats=True)
profiler.set_state('run')

w = nd.Custom(inp, op_type="MyAddOne")

mx.nd.waitall()

profiler.set_state('stop')
print(profiler.dumps())
profiler.dump(finished=False)


Here, we have created a custom operator called MyAddOne, and within its forward() function, we simply add one to the input. We can visualize the dump file in chrome://tracing/:

As shown by the screenshot, in the Custom Operator domain where all the custom operator-related events fall into, we can easily visualize the execution time of each segment of MyAddOne. We can tell that MyAddOne::pure_python is executed first. We also know that CopyCPU2CPU and _plus_scalr are two “sub-operators” of MyAddOne and the sequence in which they are executed.

Please note that: to be able to see the previously described information, you need to set profile_imperative to True even when you are using custom operators in symbolic mode (refer to the code snippet below, which is the symbolic-mode equivelent of the code example above). The reason is that within custom operators, pure python code and sub-operators are still called imperatively.

# Set profile_all to True
profiler.set_config(profile_all=True, aggregate_stats=True, continuous_dump=True)
# OR, Explicitly Set profile_symbolic and profile_imperative to True
profiler.set_config(profile_symbolic=True, profile_imperative=True, \
aggregate_stats=True, continuous_dump=True)

profiler.set_state('run')
# Use Symbolic Mode
a = mx.symbol.Variable('a')
b = mx.symbol.Custom(data=a, op_type='MyAddOne')
c = b.bind(mx.cpu(), {'a': inp})
y = c.forward()
mx.nd.waitall()
profiler.set_state('stop')
print(profiler.dumps())
profiler.dump()


### Some Rules to Pay Attention to¶

1. Always use profiler.dump(finished=False) if you do not intend to finish dumping to file. Otherwise, calling profiler.dump() in the middle of your model may lead to unexpected behaviors; and if you subsequently call profiler.set_config(), the program will error out.

2. You can only dump to one file. Do not change the target file by calling profiler.set_config(filename='new_name.json') in the middle of your model. This will lead to incomplete dump outputs.

## Advanced: Using NVIDIA Profiling Tools¶

MXNet’s Profiler is the recommended starting point for profiling MXNet code, but NVIDIA also provides a couple of tools for low-level profiling of CUDA code: NVProf, Visual Profiler and Nsight Compute. You can use these tools to profile all kinds of executables, so they can be used for profiling Python scripts running MXNet. And you can use these in conjunction with the MXNet Profiler to see high-level information from MXNet alongside the low-level CUDA kernel information.

NVProf and Visual Profiler are available in CUDA 9 and CUDA 10 toolkits. You can get a timeline view of CUDA kernel executions, and also analyse the profiling results to get automated recommendations. It is useful for profiling end-to-end training but the interface can sometimes become slow and unresponsive.

You can initiate the profiling directly from inside Visual Profiler or from the command line with nvprof which wraps the execution of your Python script. If it’s not on your path already, you can find nvprof inside your CUDA directory. See this discussion post for more details on setup.

\$ nvprof -o my_profile.nvvp python my_profiler_script.py

==11588== NVPROF is profiling process 11588, command: python my_profiler_script.py

==11588== Generated result file: /home/user/Development/incubator-mxnet/ci/my_profile.nvvp

We specified an output file called my_profile.nvvp and this will be annotated with NVTX ranges (for MXNet operations) that will be displayed alongside the standard NVProf timeline. This can be very useful when you’re trying to find patterns between operators run by MXNet, and their associated CUDA kernel calls.

You can open this file in Visual Profiler to visualize the results.

At the top of the plot we have CPU tasks such as driver operations, memory copy calls, MXNet engine operator invocations, and imperative MXNet API calls. Below we see the kernels active on the GPU during the same time period.

Zooming in on a backwards convolution operator we can see that it is in fact made up of a number of different GPU kernel calls, including a cuDNN winograd convolution call, and a fast-fourier transform call.

Selecting any of these kernel calls (the winograd convolution call shown here) will get you some interesting GPU performance information such as occupancy rates (vs theoretical), shared memory usage and execution duration.

Nsight Compute is available in CUDA 10 toolkit, but can be used to profile code running CUDA 9. You don’t get a timeline view, but you get many low level statistics about each individual kernel executed and can compare multiple runs (i.e. create a baseline).